WASHINGTON, Feb 20, (AP): US President Donald Trump's restrictions on foreign aid and targeting of a key agency funding programs around the world may be offering an opening to America's biggest adversary - China. From the dismantling of the USA gency for International Development to quitting international groups, Trump’s drastic "America First” moves have raised concerns among some lawmakers and experts about whether the US is ceding global influence to its rivals, especially at a time when Washington is fretting over Beijing’s growing clout at the cost to American interests.

Foreign assistance offered the US a source of "soft power” - allowing it to cultivate goodwill, build alliances and counter adversaries in a bid to shore up national security without having to dispatch troops, weapons or other more coercive measures. In Cambodia, the contrast could not be sharper than China sending $4.4 million to support demining operations, as Trump halted a $6.3 million grant from the State Department’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement partly meant to clear "US-origin unexploded ordnances as the remnants of war.”

Administration officials say it’s past time to review how America spends money abroad. Asked if the U.S. was giving China and Russia an opening for greater global influence, national security adviser Mike Waltz denied that, telling NBC’s "Meet the Press” recently that "all too often, these missions and these programs ... are not in line with strategic U.S. interests like pushing back on China.”

In Panama, the Trump administration got the government to quit the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s flagship overseas development program, prompting condemnation from China. Experts and lawmakers disagree on the impact of the US taking a step back from foreign aid. Lawsuits are challenging the administration's freeze on foreign assistance and moves against USAID, with temporary holds on some of those efforts.

"The second Trump administration will deliver the goal for China” of wielding greater global influence, Feng Zhang, a visiting scholar at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center, said at a recent debate in Washington. Sen. Andy Kim, a Democrat from New Jersey, was worried for the same reason. "China doesn’t even need to fight for their influence around the world now because of our own effort,” Kim said recently on "Meet the Press.”

Rep John Moolenaar, a Republican from Michigan who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said it could be time for change on foreign assistance. "I think as we dig into this, we’re going to find out what’s been working and what hasn’t been working," he said. "And then how do we innovate to a new way of promoting American interests, American values and being clear on what those values are.”